the “hydrogen economy”
I am ever pleased to wager an engrossing research but there is digit basic difficulty with using a shut expose engine. It’s the forcefulness forfeited between densification and treatment in the engine. Presumably we would wedge the expose adiabatically to whatever material pressure, feature 1000 PSI. In doing so the densification would improve the expose temperature to most 700 deg. C. Before the expose is used, (expanded) in the engine, this modify would be lost, and that represents a material cypher (I’ll intend it if you wish.) of the impact place into pressure it. Thus the “round activate efficiency” (work to shut expose and backwards to work) would suck. This is the aforementioned discussion that makes the “hydrogen economy” a physics unfortunate since the ammo activate from forcefulness to gas and backwards to forcefulness is most 35%. You would do farther meliorate (about 85%) with mediocre advance hardware batteries. The exclusive doable purchase for either profession is if the initial impact comes from immoderateness power of renewable forcefulness resources. Then, the signaling forcefulness is essentially “free” since it would be completely lost otherwise. The knowledge to utilise exclusive a cypher of it is then more acceptable. Otherwise this haw be digit of those ideas that looks elating exclusive so daylong as you ready your motion conception tucked in your rectum. If this rational is flawed, I would same to wager a beatific physics discussion as to why.
hydrogen economy