Most New York City Resident Oppose Congestion Pricing
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1302.xml?ReleaseID=1066
New royalty City reciprocation is a “very serious” problem, 59 proportionality of municipality voters say, patch 31 proportionality feature reciprocation is “somewhat serious,” according to a Quinnipiac University enquiry free May 24, 2007.
But voters, including accumulation installation users, rebut 56 - 37 proportionality a crowding pricing offering where drivers would be springy $8 to intend a automobile into borough beneath 86th Street, the autarkical Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University enquiry finds.
Manhattan voters hold crowding pricing 62 - 29 percent. Voters in another boroughs are anti to the proposal:
* 67 - 26 proportionality in The Bronx;
* 63 - 29 proportionality in Brooklyn;
* 61 - 32 proportionality in Queens;
* 69 - 26 proportionality in Staten Island.
By a 3 - 1 margin, 68 - 23 percent, New royalty City voters feature they ingest accumulation transit, kinda than a car, to movement into and discover of Manhattan. Car drivers rebut crowding pricing 59 - 34 proportionality patch accumulation installation users rebut it 53 - 40 percent.
“It’s every but unanimous. New Yorkers conceive traffic-choked streets are a bounteous problem. But Mayor Bloomberg module requirement every cat of hold from his 74 proportionality hold judgement to persuade New royalty City voters that crowding pricing is the answer,” said Maurice Carroll, administrator of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.
“As on so some municipality questions, crowding pricing is borough against everybody else. Most New Yorkers feature it would bill an dirty calculate on outer-borough drivers.”
New royalty City voters separate 45 - 46 proportionality on whether they concord with a capital hypothesis behindhand crowding pricing, that reciprocation costs them zillions of lost dollars every year. borough voters concord with the postulate patch voters in the another boroughs disagree.
Voters agree, 59 - 36 percent, that crowding pricing would set unfairly grouping who springy right Manhattan. Again, borough voters are discover of contact with voters in the another boroughs.
If there were crowding pricing, taxicabs should be exempt, voters feature 56 - 39 percent. On another doable exemptions, New royalty City voters:
* Oppose 59 - 36 proportionality exemptions for individualized vehicles;
* Oppose 70 - 26 proportionality exemptions for limousines;
* Support 49 - 45 proportionality exemptions for conveying trucks.
“Okay, let’s adopt we hit crowding pricing. Should anyone be exempt? Taxi cabs, most say, but not clannish cars and, overwhelmingly, not the artefact the flush folks mate - limousines,” writer said.
From May 15 - 21, Quinnipiac University surveyed 1,018 New royalty City qualified voters, with a edge of nonachievement of +/- 3.1 proportionality points.
The enquiry was disputed by the Campaign for New York’s Future, a alinement of organizations who hold the mayor’s PlaNYC 2030.
The Campaign springy that the enquiry unsuccessful to communicate respondents if their views on crowding pricing would modify if they thoughtful that the start would meliorate open upbeat by reaction expose pollution, create $31 1000000000 to ingest for installation repairs and expansions, and turn copy emissions by 30%. The alinement additional that the enquiry also unsuccessful to verify respondents that underway delve and denture charges would be credited against the crowding pricing, making $8 the amount coverall regular charge.
The Campaign said that in its possess poll, conducted in Apr by the concern of Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates, 70% of respondents were strongly or somewhat certain to hold the organisation after acquisition of its benefits.
Quinnipiac University Polling Institute www.quinnipiac.edu
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1302.xml?ReleaseID=1066
Crains New royalty Business www.newyorkbusiness.com
http://www.newyorkbusiness.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070524/FREE/70524003/1066